* Is #+SEQ_TODO: TODO | legal?
@ 2014-11-24 15:52 Marcin Borkowski
2014-11-24 16:46 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marcin Borkowski @ 2014-11-24 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Org-Mode mailing list
Hi there,
for some reason I want to have a TODO item that /cannot/ be (directly,
by C-c C-t) made into a "done" state. It seems that
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO |
works. Is that legal?
TIA,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Is #+SEQ_TODO: TODO | legal?
2014-11-24 15:52 Is #+SEQ_TODO: TODO | legal? Marcin Borkowski
@ 2014-11-24 16:46 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2014-11-24 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcin Borkowski; +Cc: Org-Mode mailing list
Hello,
Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes:
> for some reason I want to have a TODO item that /cannot/ be (directly,
> by C-c C-t) made into a "done" state. It seems that
>
> #+SEQ_TODO: TODO |
>
> works. Is that legal?
It may seem to work, but you are probably going to run into subtle
problems. The TODO/DONE code expects both a TODO and a DONE states.
Reconsider your reason!
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-24 16:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-24 15:52 Is #+SEQ_TODO: TODO | legal? Marcin Borkowski
2014-11-24 16:46 ` Nicolas Goaziou
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).