From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: change the latex header per subtree Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:24:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87vcd64i8h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ip9b9es1.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87obj01dhq.fsf@gmail.com> <87a9ukymd1.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <874nkr6d2w.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2ze1zmh.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ7vl-0000ht-9z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:29:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ7vi-00073K-7z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:29:05 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:54658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ7vi-00072n-1X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:29:02 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u3so910639wey.0 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:29:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d2ze1zmh.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:37:26 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Getting rid of special cased machinery to provide a more general one > counts as simplification in my book. Unless I'm mistaken, current set-up can generate any preamble. Then, how could it be special cased and how could another system be more general? I agree that current system is far from being perfect. Some other system may even be more convenient to use. But I won't buy that it will be simpler. My judgment may be clouded because I think some other parts of the exporter deserve a more immediate attention, though. >> Also, if you want to add package collections, you may include >> a header-only file in your class, I guess. > > I don't get what you are telling me here, sorry. You can have "\input{my-special-headers-A.tex}" somewhere in your class, where "my-special-headers-A.tex" file contains some package collection. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou