From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Feng Shu <tumashu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Override the default class name with a new one.
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:55:56 +0800
Message-ID: <87vc5hc8yb.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org>
References: <87hah2wn8y.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org>
	<8761xhftwi.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org> <87d2rp8370.fsf@pank.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34312)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tumashu@gmail.com>) id 1UnRym-0000zh-At
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 07:15:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tumashu@gmail.com>) id 1UnRyk-0004vX-9l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 07:15:40 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]:44990)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tumashu@gmail.com>) id 1UnRyj-0004v9-Ra
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 07:15:38 -0400
Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id fa11so552575pad.33
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 04:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87d2rp8370.fsf@pank.home> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Fri, 14
	Jun 2013 11:13:55 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> Feng Shu <tumashu@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> #+LATEX_CLASS: article
>> #+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
>
> I'm not sure this is the right approach. . .  I can certainly see the
> value of generating classes on the fly, though.  But somehow the
> proposed syntax just seems to counter-intuitive.  I'm not sure how to
> overcome this, but perhaps it would be better to allow for an argument
> to LATEX_CLASS, e.g.
>
> (*)   #+LATEX_CLASS: myclass :class-name ctexart.


CLASS and class-name are confusing,  I think LATEX_CLASS should rename
to LATEX_CLASS_FORMAT or LATEX_CLASS_TEMPLATE, but this will break=20
compatibility.

>
> as e.g. the INCLUDE command.  Of course (*) is somewhat different from
> how stuff like this is usually handled, cf. e.g. LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS.
>
> =E2=80=93Rasmus

--=20