From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Org release 8.2.5g (minor release from maint) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:55:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87vbvijghj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87k3dtsat8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqhtywkx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fvocbigv.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ios0vdnr.fsf@gmail.com> <8761ny2sj6.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ob1qf5br.fsf@gmail.com> <87siqxrfkr.fsf@gmail.com> <87eh2ho1bk.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87d2i1e3fu.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqg7ug6a.fsf@gmail.com> <8738iubhb4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh2exact.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WO72S-0005FF-9X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:55:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WO72M-0005oo-C7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:55:16 -0400 Received: from rs249.mailgun.us ([209.61.151.249]:49517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WO72M-0005oY-88 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:55:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87eh2exact.fsf@berkeley.edu> (Richard Lawrence's message of "Fri, 07 Mar 2014 08:05:38 -0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard Lawrence Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Richard, Richard Lawrence writes: > Bastien writes: > >> Eric Schulte writes: >> >>> Great, so should Org-mode require cl-lib and stop supporting the >>> following functions? >> >> I guess so. But I'm unclear yet whether this removes compatibility >> with older Emacsen. I'll check this. > > I believe it does remove compatibility with anything pre-24.0. At > least, there is no cl-lib in GNU Emacs 23.4.1, which is the version > currently in Debian stable. Any reason why Debian developers are not using 24.3 as the stable version of Emacs? It has been out for now one year. Otherwise yes, let's try to stay as much backward-compatible as possible. -- Bastien