From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:43:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87vbiia2t7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87bnkvm8la.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj8co3se.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87ioezooi2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw4bpaiu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8761aznpiq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87twyjnh0r.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oaopx24e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87k2zd4f3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egpkv8g9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <877fv6xfaq.fsf@gmail.com> <87twya2ak0.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj81aa97.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87ioep2r6p.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4ngbgm7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twy39qt2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87pp8rb1i3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d24qaj9z.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59808) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSiPb-0003o9-2Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 03:42:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSiPX-0006Wo-Sq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 03:42:42 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:43694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSiPX-0006Wg-N8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 03:42:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87d24qaj9z.fsf@berkeley.edu> (Richard Lawrence's message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:48:08 -0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard Lawrence Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Richard Lawrence writes: >> To support multi cites, we must first decide how the parsed will present >> information, i.e., what are the properties in the following case >> >> [cite:pre; pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2; post] > > I was thinking that this should yield a citation object with a structure like: > > ('citation ... > :common-prefix pre > :common-suffix post > :references ((:prefix pre1 > :key "k1" > :suffix post1 ...) > (:prefix pre2 > :key "k2" > :suffix post2 ...)) > ...) > > Would that work? Yes. I find it better than "entries/entry" as discussed with Rasmus. I'll implement it in a few days. > Oh, I did not realize there were outstanding issues with this. I > remember Rasmus not liking `&'. I'm fine with changing it, though I > cannot think of a better symbol. Does someone think we should not have > a way of indicating that a reference should produce a full bibliography > entry? Or that we should indicate it in some other way? AFAIC, I don't think a dedicated symbol is useful. It can be implemented through subtypes/properties. Besides LaTeX, could other back-end provide that feature anyway? I have no opinion about the :suppress-author symbol. Regards,