From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [DEV] Bump Emacs requirement to 24.4? Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:07:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbcbf3e9.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87io8tfrtk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vbctieu3.fsf@gmx.us> <20150806074217.00177cc9@zotac> <87lhdohmii.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnekrfgi.fsf@gmx.us> <874mk15862.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp2povpl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y4hddl2y.fsf@free.fr> <87oai4w69i.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZS9gY-0008RC-L6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:10:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZS9gV-0004qw-E8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:10:10 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZS9gV-0004pD-7p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:10:07 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZS9gQ-0007hW-NP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:10:02 +0200 Received: from x4db1a557.dyn.telefonica.de ([77.177.165.87]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:10:02 +0200 Received: from rasmus by x4db1a557.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:10:02 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Hi Nicolas and all, > > As Achim said, we may have been miscommunicating, especially on > whether it was about requiring Emacs 23+ or 24.3 vs 24.4. > > Here is my decision on this issue: > > - the Org 8.x series will be Emacs 23+ compatible. > > - the Org 9.x series will be Emacs 24.3+ compatible. > > [...] > > Let me know what you think, It would seem to me, that the natural conclusion from this is simply to EOL Org 8+ and move on to v9, no? Rasmus -- Send from my Emacs