From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Subject: Re: Clocking work time vs. office time
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:25:09 +0200
Message-ID: <87vb30vkay.fsf@mbork.pl>
References: <8a62af79ec0b4d3d9e2c2e83a053f889@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
	<87h9ek3hbv.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39658)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1aw4oQ-00016q-DX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 05:34:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1aw4nt-0002QJ-Oh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 05:34:06 -0400
Received: from [2a01:5e00:2:52::8] (port=37199 helo=mail.mojserwer.eu)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1aw4nt-0002Pk-H0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 05:33:41 -0400
In-reply-to: <87h9ek3hbv.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Org-Mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


On 2016-04-29, at 11:16, Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi Marcin,
>
> I am not sure if this will help but...
>
> [...]

Thanks, Eric!

I like the approach of not having too deep hierarchy.  Also, the idea of
having two parallel trees (for "remote" and "office" work) is ok.

However, this does not help with my main issue: tracking /time in
office/.  Not /time in office working/, mind you.

I'd like to have a report like this (I mean information, not
formatting):

* Office time: 2:00
** Task 1/Project A: 0:30
** Task 2/Project B: 0:45

* Home time:
** Task 1/Project A: 1:15
** Task 2/Project B: 0:30

So not only time spent on actual work on various tasks/projects, but
also time /spent physically in the office/.

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University