From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Welle Subject: Re: org-tempo violating org-mode conventions since 9.2 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:47:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87va2bbvil.fsf@luisa.c0t0d0s0.de> References: <87pnskiv03.fsf@aminb.org> <87o983rg7w.fsf@luisa.c0t0d0s0.de> <87pnsj3icy.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnKYz-000883-Hb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 04:47:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnKYv-0005sy-5w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 04:47:42 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:52719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnKYu-0005L7-Ou for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 04:47:41 -0500 Received: from stella.c0t0d0s0.de ([89.204.154.102]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFtf4-1gzxbB3Hvy-00EyuD for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:47:31 +0100 Received: from Stella (stella.c0t0d0s0.de [192.168.42.1]) by stella.c0t0d0s0.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DDD181138 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:47:30 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87pnsj3icy.fsf@gmail.com> (Tim Cross's message of "Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:58:53 +1100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Tim Cross writes: > I totally agree that block delimiters should be case > insensitive. However, I think the ability for a user to set their > preference for either upper case or lower case is reasonable. It does > not need to affect the syntactic interpretation, just whether the > template system does it in upper case or lower case. I have no idea how > much more complex this would make the tempo definitions though. ah, I understand. I had the generating part as well as the parsing part in mind when I wrote my last posting. But you are right, making customisable how the blocks are generated wouldn't hurt anyone, I think. Maybe it is enough to change org-create-dblock, maybe there are more places to look at. Regards hmw