From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Possible bug
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 21:32:32 +0100
Message-ID: <87twxs1tlr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <931fda3be08d4908bfbced55e9a9c170@fcmailsvr2.familycareinc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36608)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YVQoK-0006e2-Gy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:31:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YVQoE-0000R0-PU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:31:28 -0400
Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:52093)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YVQoE-0000Qb-Jz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:31:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <931fda3be08d4908bfbced55e9a9c170@fcmailsvr2.familycareinc.org>
	(Subhan Michael Tindall's message of "Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:24:54
	+0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Subhan Michael Tindall <SubhanT@familycareinc.org>
Cc: "'emacs-orgmode@gnu.org'" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Subhan Michael Tindall <SubhanT@familycareinc.org> writes:

> I'm not sure if this counts as a bug or not:
>
> If I run a custom agenda (eg. "R") with sticky agendas, it displays in an buffer with the name
> *Org Agenda (R)*
> If this buffer is then renamed to e.g.
> (rename-buffer "*R-Agenda*")

Why would you need that?

> *R-Agenda*
> And is then refreshed by hitting r, the agenda is properly rebuilt BUT in a new buffer named *Org Agenda(R)*, resulting in two differing agendas.
>
> Is this appropriate behavior? It seems that rebuilding the agenda
> should respect the current buffer name. I'm very new at programing for
> lisp, so I'm not sure I'm using the right functions here.

IIRC, sticky agenda relies on buffer names to know if agenda needs to be
updated. So, it is not a good idea to rename agenda buffers.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou