From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Subject: Re: org files and projects nested git repositories
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:55:42 -0500
Message-ID: <87twmy78i9.fsf@kyleam.com>
References: <87oad6ldqv.fsf@plantarum.ca> <8737ui8oq5.fsf@kyleam.com>
	<87bn96layw.fsf@plantarum.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55125)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1aEiOD-0001F3-6z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:55:58 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1aEiO8-0002Ww-3X
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:55:57 -0500
Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:63310
	helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1aEiO7-0002Ws-Tu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:55:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87bn96layw.fsf@plantarum.ca> (Tyler Smith's message of "Thu, 31
	Dec 2015 13:38:47 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Tyler Smith <tyler@plantarum.ca>
Cc: orgmode list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Tyler Smith <tyler@plantarum.ca> writes:

[...]

> I have tried links, but in all my attempts the links break whenever the
> source or the target is committed to version control. My understanding
> that each new commit to a file effectively changes the inode, breaking
> the link.

Are you thinking of hard links rather than symbolic links?  Symbolic
links should play well with Git (ignoring Windows).  The popular tool
git-annex is even built around symbolic links.

> In your use, are the targets and their links both under
> version control? If so, obviously they aren't breaking, so I must be
> doing something wrong when I try the same thing.

Yes, the target is under version control in the project repo, and the
agenda repo tracks a symbolic link to the target, so the content of that
file is just a path to the target.

--
Kyle