From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Laurence Rochfort <laurence.rochfort@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: Canceling a TODO state change does not revert the heading
 [9.0.5 (9.0.5-elpa @ /home/laurence/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20170210/)]
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:36:36 +0100
Message-ID: <87tw5iupgr.fsf@lrochfor-desktop.uk.oracle.com>
References: <87y3v7gxwn.fsf@lrochfor-desktop.uk.oracle.com>
	<87d1c66fm6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55204)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <laurence.rochfort@oracle.com>) id 1d1TzU-0002Jw-Uc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 04:32:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <laurence.rochfort@oracle.com>) id 1d1TzP-0002kj-TR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 04:32:32 -0400
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:23261)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <laurence.rochfort@oracle.com>)
	id 1d1TzP-0002k7-L9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 04:32:27 -0400
In-reply-to: <87d1c66fm6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou writes:

> I disagree. You may want to cancel the message because this change
> doesn't require one, but, yet, want the todo state change.

I see, that makes sense.

I notice that supplying an empty message with C-c C-k results in no
logbook entry at all. Is that intended behaviour too?

Cheers,
Laurence.