From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 51OoGhWJfGNIaQAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:32:21 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0MHCGRWJfGNVMAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:32:21 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17490226F8 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:32:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxOgP-0003T2-5m; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 03:31:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxOgN-0003SJ-HI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 03:31:07 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxOgH-0000Dg-PE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 03:31:06 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7011C240103 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:30:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1669105859; bh=YPx0TvMjHxw8ljsKCmdWAijtcCMQkhPl9FqePbMsVRU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=JsDuLQX4LcZfDOCUsZyDatkqVPtKhp4Z7ALrTXcQgKBvE0VaLicdz1K3s017LWQQG jxMCmfF/yrvTi+Y3fC6faCHQEVHi3bssHfSjcJi/4s05znkMkevFisMVDqJGW6eWHo WYVbKw1TCDEsUL9MRG5P8vlryQukelLMw69Y4rHEgBgugyDLJy6r0X39HwtTh76/TL 1XW0KkPfjwULyLAaiJF3FUtlnZRbxcouPGOMDDG1rcYWRDxP18HqAHo2clSgJmW9e4 KwDP6U3UsT692jvAk0mVEEqHE9x+gJ9lNYbldhQaJDl9xIRsYWRm5caZnviyEbPOko dvDZIlecz2Hag== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NGcsZ1PPcz9rxM; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:30:57 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: alain.cochard@unistra.fr Cc: Org Mode List Subject: [RFC] Backend vs. back-end (was: 2 'echo' bash instructions produce a table) In-Reply-To: <25461.4423.734070.149776@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <25447.23346.575598.420558@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87tu3ba40w.fsf@localhost> <25457.22124.839301.412560@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87pmdqfao4.fsf@localhost> <25461.4423.734070.149776@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:31:39 +0000 Message-ID: <87tu2rie50.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -26 X-Spam_score: -2.7 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1669105941; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ip2BQ33Tx1WRXkxc9q4pkkLXx5EQ1yltvABAWqgLoi8=; b=PSjYhC7la/XIV6ZfxUBCWHLAuwGwk6rPgMSRL7PV1pFXK+fj2JVtr/hOsNpaXAe0/l6n+r 7CilxNV3okAGHwHeIChGAsGAnSmwJw3Gni9jT2OTNW5iX05JJzJZHxs0x244Rhls5IM6V8 z4rPdHiSmW26Ww8IRxL2lH7d03zsnmGzQRg4fSfp+eLw420x7yIqb7ny/J09hj5QLu2zDP L2yciOAlknDKLUbEpqtHBjl1xC1eChF1cYHGxZLsgCplpcRbyvmhgO4rHdjCuUpPdGTT7Q wF3+v4adHUDwqndgzFuoT6HGOv7tpHpcc2nMxV68p4gH2kBqjXFwYEM3yYw31Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1669105941; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QL8PeWLsdhp3218yHXjZ2LUr+jS2iYYqUSbPqfX6rpW8ofVcphgw/8JIjag5uZ9ic7/Dfl M2XFLPps4Yc+vIrUMbluRmB/b2fRu0w45stGh9NKankXaWznGypzjgVoeTrl1pjt76krrh umxayNXKMYoDxpsWAsgyYO/TlQ4cphIQjCIIRWAstEeEl2JSuGREYpWRf9glj/84z0FxNh pbJs8CcqshwOQV9NCOPYAFElhSQf41+LgtxlfC5sWvmr/csVlql+JUjeHwpdvJgx4vT9c+ kJgOR3TasiW1oKYcoKXTHTXIE9x5iP9eSQvh741v90Nx8usIaLtT8rDJ+ouYpw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=JsDuLQX4; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.21 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=JsDuLQX4; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 17490226F8 X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: AKVXZ5rC0r8E Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr writes: > PS 1: In the manual, I see "backend" and "back-end". So it is an > issue similar to the "subtree/sub-tree" issue you fixed a few days > ago, to the "heading/headline" issue that was reported recently, and > to many similar cases I met in the past. So I was wondering if there > could exist some (semi-)automatic way which would ensure that future > maintainers will not inadvertently re-introduce "sub-tree" > occurrences, or the like. Perhaps some "accepted terminology" list > that would be checked upon? I looked into the manual. It has 197 instances of "back-end" and 24 instances of "backend". In the code, "backend" is used almost exclusively in symbol names (except 5 instances), and "back-end" is used in the docstrings and comments. It is actually a bit confusing. I am looking at https://techterms.com/definition/backend, and it looks like "backend" is the correct word we need to use here. Am I missing something? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at