From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Outline cycling does not preserve point's position Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:24:55 +0530 Message-ID: <87sixaedhc.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20130910075345.GP20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <25A21DB7-B2E5-47BB-8A64-594A15CB24B8@gmail.com> <20130910085057.GQ20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <4ED2509E-8A2E-4ED2-BFCF-CB7B27F1D2B4@gmail.com> <20130910095043.GR20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87a9jk8wmr.fsf@gmail.com> <20130910185843.GA20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <871u4w8nkq.fsf@gmail.com> <47C95833-7AC7-493C-AA1B-9E733549A443@gmail.com> <20130911122423.GG20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0lp-0004m4-TL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0lh-0005K1-Gd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:52:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]:52599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0lh-0005Im-92 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:52:45 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q10so10258287pdj.21 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:52:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130911122423.GG20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> (Suvayu Ali's message of "Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:24:23 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Suvayu Ali Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Suvayu Ali writes: >> And I agree with you, beginning of line is a good target column. > > On reading Nicolas's explanation, I agree too. This is better. The decision should be based on what the user would do after doing a C-down and C-up. If *you* use C-down and C-up for persusal (as yourself say), I don't think you will use C-k immediately. I sense that you are not representing yourself in a consistent way. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Speaking for myself, I ran C-down and C-up on unit test file for ODT export. It is not a representative text. It contains (deeply) indented lists and multiple headline levels etc. When the cursor is on a bol, it is difficult to get a quick feedback on where exactly the cursor is. i.e., I was forced to use hl-line-mode.