From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Subject: Re: ox-texinfo: Link to dedicated to target doesn't work Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 10:19:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87siaexysv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <mk9ji3$6mu$1@ger.gmane.org> <87eglzqsvw.fsf@selenimh.access.network> <55691F09.4020305@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Yybxz-000342-9P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 04:18:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Yybxy-0002yW-6u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 04:18:03 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:45982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Yybxx-0002vz-WD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 04:18:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55691F09.4020305@gmail.com> (Vaidheeswaran C.'s message of "Sat, 30 May 2015 07:53:05 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>, <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>, <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Vaidheeswaran C <vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com> Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Vaidheeswaran C <vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com> writes: > A canonical DESCRIPTION is NOT available. (YET) The ANCHOR should > still get through to the `texi' file, right? We can replace a silly behaviour with another silly one, yes. But is there any non-silly one? > This is the output I see in other backends (that support anchors). > > HTML: > > <p> > Jump to <a href="#orgtarget1">No description for this link</a>. > </p> The example above is a bit misleading because a description is not mandatory. In your situation, Option "num:t" would be sufficient to produce something. > LaTeX: > > Jump to \ref{orgtarget1}. If you look at it, this will not appear in the (PDF) output as there's nothing to refer to, much like what happens in ox-texinfo. In any case, what exactly do you suggest in this situation, i.e., what should be displayed? Regards,