From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: org-lint complains about planning info line in inline task Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 23:24:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87si5acxru.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <20151014153733.GA31296@boo.workgroup> <87fv1dxgxn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20151014221406.GB18278@boo.workgroup> <874mhtxe56.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20151016204617.GA6547@boo.workgroup> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnCSV-00084W-S4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:22:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnCSV-0006Yp-8Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:22:39 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:41772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnCSV-0006Ya-2j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:22:39 -0400 Received: from selenimh (unknown [IPv6:2a01:6600:8080:9601::2de]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B181B172085 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 23:22:37 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20151016204617.GA6547@boo.workgroup> (Gregor Zattler's message of "Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:46:17 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Hello, Gregor Zattler writes: > org-lint cpmlains: > 10702 low Misplaced planning info line > > because of this: > > ***************************** DONE XXXX xxx XXXXX xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx > DEADLINE: <2011-11-25 Fr> CLOSED: [2011-12-17 Sa 21:42] > <2011-11-22 Di> > :LOGBOOK: > - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2011-12-17 Sa 21:42] \\ > erledigt > :END: > ***************************** END > > is it right to do so? I thought planning info lines go right > below the headline? This is fixed. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou