From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] org-sort: Read compare-func in interactive calls Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 10:24:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87shk7zw08.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <871srz5mbr.fsf@kyleam.com> <20170509194750.8974-1-kyle@kyleam.com> <87tw4r12ww.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8737cax2tm.fsf@kyleam.com> <87h90q1rf6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lgq0retg.fsf@kyleam.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9opQ-00068j-QN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2017 04:24:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9opN-0002IZ-MX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2017 04:24:36 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::200]:52583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9opN-0002F1-EH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2017 04:24:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lgq0retg.fsf@kyleam.com> (Kyle Meyer's message of "Sat, 13 May 2017 10:50:35 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Kyle Meyer Cc: Zhitao Gong , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Kyle Meyer writes: > I think (interactive "p"), or (interactive "P\np"), would be undesirable > because we'd be 1) changing the call signatures in a way that's not > backward compatible and 2) positioning an argument that shouldn't > concern most users toward the front of the argument list. I don't understand this. Why would using (interactive "p") instead of (interactive "P") would be incompatible? AFAIU, the only difference is how the argument value is treated within the callee. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou