From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEdlbmVyYXRpbmcgc2l0ZW1hcDog4oCYb3JnLXB1Ymxpc2gt?= =?UTF-8?B?Y2FjaGUtZ2V04oCZIGNhbGxlZCwgYnV0IG5vIGNhY2hlIHByZXNlbnQ=?= Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:35:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87shb79re3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <4692B909-86A5-4209-8EBE-3EDCCEC5E5A6@agrarianresearch.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb4v4-0002pC-NX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 08:35:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb4v3-0006BH-IY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 08:35:22 -0500 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::194]:37765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb4v3-0006Ah-Bm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 08:35:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4692B909-86A5-4209-8EBE-3EDCCEC5E5A6@agrarianresearch.org> (Vikas Rawal's message of "Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:01:36 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Vikas Rawal Cc: org-mode mailing list Hello, Vikas Rawal writes: > I have been using the following code block to generate a sitemap for my org-jkyll based blog. > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results output silent :exports none :cache yes > (org-publish-sitemap > (assoc "indblog" org-publish-project-alist) > "sitemap.org") > #+end_src > > I had not generated the sitemap for a while, and now I find that it > ends with the following message, and sitemap.org > is not recreated. `org-publish-sitemap' is not meant to be called directly. It assumes project is properly set-up, which is done in its caller, `org-publish-projects'. So, why don't you simply publish "indblog" project? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou