From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#35419: [Proposal] Buffer Lenses and the Case of Org-Mode (also,
 Jupyter)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:37:06 -0400
Message-ID: <87sgu6rhkt.fsf__7720.79582545615$1556157580$gmane$org@gmail.com>
References: <CA+Yh0SQ7yWQBjXhKbJPrCroriNpwhyFyQWAfHsUvxwmojsjKuw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38396)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hJTfC-0006Gj-Oc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:59:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hJTPl-0005LQ-2f
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:43:05 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35419.B35419.15561562383148@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+Yh0SQ7yWQBjXhKbJPrCroriNpwhyFyQWAfHsUvxwmojsjKuw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Dmitrii Korobeinikov's message of "Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:35:16 +0600")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Dmitrii Korobeinikov <dim1212k@gmail.com>
Cc: 35419@debbugs.gnu.org

Dmitrii Korobeinikov <dim1212k@gmail.com> writes:

> * Implementation
>
>   I am not familiar with Emacs internals to say what's feasible of the
> proposed structure.

Have you looked at Phil Lord's lentic package?  I think it implements a
lot of what you're talking about.

https://github.com/phillord/lentic