From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id qNgLKNK0E2cAUwEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 13:32:02 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id qNgLKNK0E2cAUwEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:32:02 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Vdo1ajfv; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1729344722; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aoZF1q4Pc1ONBNIac/fJp9bIJT6rrKqlqJAcluKw7FxAMaWgcG+PHF69oWCcdsQJZnagAm dCbfYFMvtWJFYHmQEy7PpqFF8OXnMjgbGLdo1jsCpmCEePwVzar8j0mTyzm1Z8NpWRQIKa 2it6MetlnF3P5wL4b/JDrS7ze3xx7zkEHmBykwvZHSI1Aqi39EHg5aW3AwtJxjcB7vJJOI 5fmsbvAdb+5gACJ+uax41WU+Kghy7flE0ktiKX0HKTiuKa6tFWsshMYUSGM3dkVfV8t82O zaivvZh/QvgCn6D0ZmuqftE8faUIDpx8wXT+FOMDUGYsdAkQ5vPw2WJkpspylA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Vdo1ajfv; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1729344722; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Xp5856YWX941uAiC1W0zJteD4xFanBBjNH38TZ3z6fY=; b=Od8V5HT38ViGE5EXph/S58nGfD3t9gJzHMisQsC3uRHrZYOGUCm6ssaVSYovELJQ/7O2MZ yo9emV6ZNeqRyVKBZ0hRanVE9SLHBb3P7p2MrL1W/ckJc3ViHsJ0n2xTiior5spEWoPa3y yXNG0oi0Gk8DEStqMutP09K1WJH7JjlBOLtFZhbdMV6v6S8VnWlWo5UPI8mqeaiTSEP/6R 3A/iwTzA2BtSMah5FMkKviG9YtYe0eKNpHQH25+3I1Zlbqu2tXQq7VDlfuWAtAM9ZI95lE Ktm0sW03tEduD5IDSWLXoH4LQtfgDHsDN3Oe76az4YtUl+bWxZY35/zbXeIBmg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A82E1B00A for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:32:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t29Y1-0005Mo-UY; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 09:31:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t29Xu-0005Md-NG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 09:31:07 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t29Xs-0006zU-LJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 09:31:06 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F7BA240101 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:31:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1729344661; bh=FygZ1KBbshvdifCkHD6C5sny2LsijZs6q9CPrZu6rEw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=Vdo1ajfvGmJS6jnQ6PuiCsAgJYjqWQV/khD2mxLaCQXo7Yhb8wGEtupntQoxx++Bu qLl0yV6ZzZh0PAqys+TLjPT68xfcfKqnuZlTT4fiQW4GXfmtKXvR/FDztudJr90mmn 9KkfAUV0428j3EoU61+r4u+w4s4cG+M4IldsRxAtyjAJM68VKozeEqMH77wwm0SQZQ LkjiUrdCZ5/t3gb8hQ4woHErdyZojlIvMy6Se0NGGgVvdviPR6qXaT8OHS4jsPN1Qx OnJICHRMvUQP5sRabOCoxYD2pVNJdHQT1+YWCj0tdk2nY2PQ3JLG7WfhYuZbX1zj3T NDMWXN0OUHk0g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4XW2X41WmCz6tvh; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:31:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Roi Martin Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Avoid "Scheme implementation" prompt on export In-Reply-To: <87y12rng3q.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y12rng3q.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 13:32:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87sessusjk.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.18 X-Spam-Score: -1.18 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4A82E1B00A X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: 1/c0U3n/f2YN Roi Martin writes: > I have an org document with the following structure: > > --- > Racket code block: > > #+begin_src scheme > #lang racket > (+ 1 2) > #+end_src > ... > It includes several code blocks with different scheme implementations > (e.g. Racket and Chez). > > When I export the document to HTML, both from the Org Export Dispatcher > (C-c C-e) or calling (org-publish-all), I'm asked to choose a "Scheme > implementation" for every code block. > > If I understand correctly, I can set a default Scheme implementation > with the `geiser-scheme-implementation' variable. However, I would like > to specify an implementation per block without having to answer the > prompt every time. > > Is it possible? Org mode fontification routines do not support multiple different variants of major mode in src blocks. We also cannot handle major modes prompting user when they are activated. Actually, I have no idea how to handle such scenarios. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at