From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: simultaneous clocks? Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:27:19 -0400 Message-ID: <87r5kfpw9k.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> References: <4C0FE13B.3040002@ccbr.umn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46325 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMVcT-0003G9-Fa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:27:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMVcS-00043I-4V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:27:41 -0400 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:63266) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMVcS-00042P-2X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:27:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C0FE13B.3040002@ccbr.umn.edu> (Erik Iverson's message of "Wed\, 09 Jun 2010 13\:45\:15 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Erik Iverson Cc: emacs-orgmode Erik Iverson writes: > Hello, > > Is there any concept of being able to run multiple, simultaneous > clocks in org-mode. For example, I want one clock to track my total > hours during the week at work, i.e., punch in and punch out. No. Org-mode clocking clocks a single task at a time. You can't do two things at once :) > > Then, while that clock is running, I would use the normal clocking > functionality to keep track of time on specific projects. I punch in to a default task which starts my clocking day. Everytime I clock out the default task is clocked in to keep every minute clocked from the moment I punch in until I punch out. Publishing my current clocking setup is on my todo list and will be on http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html soon. > > As it is, clocking into a new task clocks out of the current task. > > There may not be a way, but thought I'd ask! Regards, Bernt