Re: Export formats: Is there an in-house Emacs final format?

[Darlan Cavalcante Moreira <darcamo@gmail.com>]

As I understand, "C-c C-x C-v" (org-toggle-inline-images) will only show
images inline, not latex fragments (equations). For latex you want "C-c
C-x C-v" (org-preview-latex-fragment).

I have a folder with org files as my personal "knowledge archive" and I
use both org-toggle-inline-images and
org-preview-latex-fragment. Org-mode is indeed very nice for this
"conversation with myself" use case. Obviously you still get better
(prettier) results if you export the org file, but I rarely need to do
that.

--
Darlan

mankoff@gmail.com writes:

> Hi Lawrence,
>
> emacs (in a window, not in the terminal) allows display of images. 
> C-c C-x C-v will display your LaTeX equations as graphics in the 
> buffer. No need for other software.
>
> You could also look at UTF-8 mode (C-c C-x \) to display \alpha and 
> x_y as their respective greek and subscript sympbols, for example.
>
> And finally you could look into various pretty-symbol modes so your 
> text and even python code looks more analog. With pretty symbols 
> np.sum(sqrt(x)) looks like the greek sum and the sqrt symbols. A 
> cheap ASCII view would be: Ev(x)
>
>    -k.
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
>
>> I'm a beginner, and I'm trying to imagine how I'd use org mode to 
>> create a sort of running conversation with myself. That is, I'd 
>> like to do a form of journaling where I could make notes to 
>> myself, which would include the usual text as outlne-hierarchy, 
>> hyperlinks too, but also babel code chunks, as well as any sort of 
>> mathematical formulae I might want to include. It's this last 
>> requirement that seems to be the hardest. As far as I can tell, 
>> the readability of my raw org file would go out the window when I 
>> started trying to put in math formulae. As I understand, you 
>> basically do raw Tex markup for math stuff -- and you can only see 
>> the results when you export to something external to Emacs like 
>> html for a browser or PDF for a PDF viewer. Is this correct?
>>
>> And for my title question, is there a native "in-house" i.e., the 
>> final product is viewable in Emacs, export that would be rich 
>> enough (text, images, and math symbols)? Besides the embedding of 
>> a PDF viewer in a buffer trick, Emacs seems to have only Info. 
>> Does Info allow images and fairly normal-looking math symbols? Or 
>> is "final product" always an off-site, extra-Emacs business?
>>
>> Lawrence Bottorff
>> North Shore MN
>>


-- 
Darlan Cavalcante Moreira
darcamo@gmail.com