emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)]
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:53:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r3durmc6.fsf@gmx.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87a8kivzcc.fsf@saiph.selenimh

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> Ultimately, I think a decent fix would be to add a prefix to
>> org-latex--label for targets pointing to footnotes.  They should be
>> prefixed with "fn:".  Then, it should be easy to hack together
>> a filter.
>
> OOC, isn't `org-export-filter-footnote-reference-functions' enough as
> a filter?

Probably I’m lacking the adequate creativity.

I’ll sketch the problem as I see it.

Consider the filter FUN and the below file.

The transcoded version of the second "[fn:1]", say S2, will be passed to
our filter FUN, if FUN is added to
org-export-filter-footnote-reference-functions.  But S2 will only contain
the estimated number of the footnote¹, e.g. "\footnotemark[1]{}".  In
particular, we haven’t got the potentially transcoded reference to the
footnote definition.  Without the reference, I don’t know how to add a
hyperref link.

We could capture the transcoded version of the link "[[f1]]" in FUN, if
FUN is added to org-export-filter-link-functions (I think).  But by then
we’d only be served a generic reference, e.g. "\ref{org925ce52}".  I don’t
know how we’d then differentiate between a link to a footnote and to some
other type of element, e.g. a source block.  Hence, it becomes hard to
guess when to use e.g. \footref{.} instead of \ref{.}.

Rasmus

* head
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: h1
:END:
Line1.[fn:1] or [[f1]]

\pagebreak

Line2[fn:1] [[f1]]
* Footnotes
[fn:1] <<f1>> Footnote.


Footnotes: 
¹   It’s estimated because it’s not done on the latex side.  E.g. I can
    get an incorrect number by adding this to the top of my file:
        #+latex: \addtocounter{footnote}{1}
    More realistically, breakage would occur when a footnote is added by
    some arbitrary latex command that Org doesn’t know about.
    
-- 
Dung makes an excellent fertilizer

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-25 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-23 20:54 Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)] Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
2016-04-25  8:38 ` Rasmus
2016-04-25  8:58   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-04-25 10:53     ` Rasmus [this message]
2016-04-25 11:41       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-04-25 13:36         ` Rasmus
2016-04-25 13:57           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-04-25 14:04             ` Rasmus
2016-04-25 14:07               ` Rasmus
2016-05-22 20:16             ` Rasmus
2016-05-23 21:41               ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-24 20:59                 ` [patch] more robust footnotes (was: Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)]) Rasmus
2016-05-24 21:31                   ` [patch] more robust footnotes Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-24 21:38                     ` Rasmus
2016-05-24 21:54                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-25  7:16                         ` Rasmus
2016-05-25 16:50                           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-25 17:51                             ` Rasmus
2016-08-10 21:09                 ` Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)] Kaushal Modi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r3durmc6.fsf@gmx.us \
    --to=rasmus@gmx.us \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).