From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: 9.0.6 and clock tables Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 12:16:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3016kfh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87mvavoyxw.fsf@t3610> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45849) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7JFH-0008LJ-3N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2017 06:16:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7JFD-0002Ui-UZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2017 06:16:55 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::200]:53362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7JFD-0002US-Oe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2017 06:16:51 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACD63F91 for ; Sun, 7 May 2017 12:16:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saiph.selenimh (00004301000000000000074b.ipv6.commingeshautdebit.fr [IPv6:2a03:a0a0:0:4301::74b]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90EDCA80C1 for ; Sun, 7 May 2017 12:16:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ngz by saiph.selenimh with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1d7JFC-0000j6-71 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2017 12:16:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mvavoyxw.fsf@t3610> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Tue, 02 May 2017 20:12:27 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Eric S Fraga writes: > Just a quick note: I upgraded to v9.0.6 and my clock table reports no > longer show %age time spend on each activity. I've not had a chance to > debug this yet but clock tables generated earlier today had percentages > where I wanted them. > > I'll debug tomorrow but I thought I'd bring this up now just in case > anybody else runs into this problem. Would you happen to have any news on it? BTW, you may need to remove any TBLFM: entry related to % since this is no longer necessary when using :formula %. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou