From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: default value for org-capture-templates Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 14:41:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87r2e01md0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <99a3fff5-b9c2-44e9-965a-e40c9fe89ffe@www.fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdFYO-0000jn-6q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:25:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdFNl-0003dW-G8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:14:33 -0500 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:40211) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdErv-0002xT-Gu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:41:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <99a3fff5-b9c2-44e9-965a-e40c9fe89ffe@www.fastmail.com> (Tyler Smith's message of "Fri, 28 Dec 2018 11:17:19 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Tyler Smith Cc: Emacs Org-Mode Help Hello, "Tyler Smith" writes: > A question came up on StackOverflow asking about how to use the > default capture template (`Task`) in combination with user-defined > templates: > https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/46794/where-is-default-org-mode-capture-template-for-tasks-located > > The default Task template is actually stored in the function > `org-capture-select-template`. This is a bit surprising, and requires > the user to manually transfer it to the the variable > `org-capture-templates` if they want to keep it as one of their > options. > > Is there a reason not to set this built-in `Task` template as the > default value of `org-capture-templates`? That would provide the user > with a transparent way of keeping it as an option, modifying it, or > removing it, as they prefer, through the usual customize interface. > > I can put together a patch to do this if I haven't overlooked > a problem this would create. I think you can go ahead. Thank you. Have you signed FSF papers? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou