From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christopher Schmidt <christopher@ch.ristopher.com>
Subject: Re: orgstruct-mode with custom headline prefix
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:21:04 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <87pq0l3gr2@ch.ristopher.com>
References: <87vcah6xf5@ch.ristopher.com> <8738xh4xfr@ch.ristopher.com>
	<87y5f994ni.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59469)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <christopher@ch.ristopher.com>) id 1U0pOQ-00027T-HC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 03:21:13 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <christopher@ch.ristopher.com>) id 1U0pON-0002jW-NR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 03:21:10 -0500
Received: from ristopher.com ([146.185.21.93]:52476
	helo=saturn.ch.ristopher.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <christopher@ch.ristopher.com>) id 1U0pON-0002jM-Em
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 03:21:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87y5f994ni.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Thu,
	31 Jan 2013 08:45:53 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes:
> Can you give an indication on how it impacts the generation of agenda?
> This is a potential blocker.

It should not impact agenda generation at all - neither feature nor
performance-wise.  All non-trivial changes are in parts of the code that
directly relate to orgstruct-mode or
org-\(forward\|backward\)-heading-same-level.  These functions and their
internals are not used non-interactively.

> Also, we won't be able to apply such a change until you assign your
> copyright to the FSF.  I'm not asking you to go through this now
> because I'm not sure we should apply the patch, but just to let you
> know.

I am familiar with the procedure.  The copyright of this patch goes to
the FSF, of course, and I have FSF papers signed.

        Christopher