From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Patch to implement sorting Org tables by IP address Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 18:18:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppbm6tgl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87r3w4a326.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tx0z8vxw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <42DDD6AD-8F6F-4F85-840B-4C3946AD3C55@mac.com> <87oar78ro1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8C2CF3B2-399D-4944-8CE9-D486EA1A0985@mac.com> <87bnn78apu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <2217AFF8-7135-4EAC-A189-8152FDDE52F9@mac.com> <87tx0y79st.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <63EA1170-B4E2-4CB8-95CD-77AF7AA117C3@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0CnW-0005Am-66 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:17:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0CnM-0001M2-1b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:17:34 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:47756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0CnL-0001Ls-Ra for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:17:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <63EA1170-B4E2-4CB8-95CD-77AF7AA117C3@mac.com> (Jon Snader's message of "Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:19:34 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jon Snader Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Jon Snader writes: > As I see it, we=E2=80=99ve reached the conclusion that we should either h= ave > some sort of minimal table-driven mechanism or duplicate the > functionality in org-sort-list. I like duplicating the org-sort-list > functionality best. As you pointed out before, org-do-sort is an > internal function and we probably shouldn=E2=80=99t let users mess with i= t. We > could, I suppose, move all the work out to org-table-sort-lines but > then org-do-sort is little more than a call to sort. You can move `org-do-sort' into "org-table.el" with an "org-table--" prefix, if you want to. > As I said above, you=E2=80=99ve convinced me that ?f ?F is the right solu= tion. Fair enough. Let's settle on that, then. Thanks. Regards,