Re: [PATCH] Reschedule "++" repeaters on same day if in future

[Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>]

Hello,

Don March <don@donmarch.net> writes:

> If you have a task with the following timestamp:
>
>     SCHEDULED: <2016-06-19 Sun 21:00 ++1w>
>
> then marking it as DONE at [2016-06-27 at 07:00] should (debatably)
> result in

ISYM [2016-06-26 at 07:00].

>     SCHEDULED: <2016-06-26 Sun 21:00 ++1w>
>
> but instead it becomes
>
>     SCHEDULED: <2016-07-03 Sun 21:00 ++1w>

With the correction above, it makes sense, indeed.

> -				     (<= (time-to-days time)
> -					 (time-to-days (current-time))))
> +				     (or (time-less-p time (current-time))
> +					 (equal time (current-time))))

You should merge both `or'. Also, (equal time (current-time)) is always
nil since they don't have the same structure.

You could write instead

  (while (or (= nshift 0)
             (not (time-less-p (current-time) time)))
    ...)

It would be nice to add an explanation along with an example about that
in the manual, too. WDYT?

Thank you for your patch.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou