From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: recent org-mode changes: completion of repeated tasks reports
 "10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today"
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:12:11 -0500
Message-ID: <87pnt0a65g.fsf@norang.ca>
References: <87wonbdzc0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<739521c7-7864-8b86-3223-8fb9f9335a36@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59784)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1giiNA-0001Dg-8C
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:12:28 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1giiN9-0001SM-Ky
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:12:28 -0500
Received: from outbound1.eu.mailhop.org ([52.28.251.132]:10831)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1giiN9-0001On-Dj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:12:27 -0500
In-Reply-To: <739521c7-7864-8b86-3223-8fb9f9335a36@oracle.com> (Daniel
	Ortmann's message of "Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:07:47 -0600")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Ortmann <daniel.ortmann@oracle.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Daniel Ortmann <daniel.ortmann@oracle.com> writes:

> I have a weekly scheduled task with ...
> =C2=A0 DEADLINE: <2019-01-18 Fri ++1w -0d>
>
> Recently, when I complete the task it reports the following:
>
> Clock stopped at [2019-01-11 Fri 17:03] after 0:05
> 10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today.=C2=A0
> Continue? (y or n) n
>
> Thoughts?

Hi Daniel,

Do you have some other repeating timestamp buried somewhere in that
task?  It is probably moving that one forward and it is the one that
needs more than 10 repeats to become current.

There was a recent change that updates all repeating timestamps in the
task.

Regards,
Bernt