From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id iMhaJ/qen2BvXQEAgWs5BA
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 15 May 2021 12:14:18 +0200
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp2 with LMTPS
	id 4H7xIvqen2BKQQAAB5/wlQ
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 15 May 2021 10:14:18 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D142821DB7
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 15 May 2021 12:14:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:47916 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lhrJH-0008GL-I8
	for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 15 May 2021 06:14:15 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34870)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <utkarsh190601@gmail.com>)
 id 1lhrFI-0007xi-PC
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2021 06:10:08 -0400
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]:43798)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <utkarsh190601@gmail.com>)
 id 1lhrFH-0001LO-00; Sat, 15 May 2021 06:10:08 -0400
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d78so639328pfd.10;
 Sat, 15 May 2021 03:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :mime-version; bh=9qOLcuN0gnoZhyVG2QTajwraQv7+oFDkni5kBbNUQoA=;
 b=LdTIC/b5htBIJa20ymMl5pUG68C6Gup9tPg+OvIRUeoSl0yDmfikcyLvoTIY+Tw/KZ
 cmJpIuMu7tgEgoCUg3IazqrhWaPawCXHHrP7XlkBbHXglhKaiPxYpL2arZACh/dBjpjr
 sIX0JWajT8za88zVzc7UlMs+6kM12TYl2CMg0NwVnvknKIqjJqSHPTj6VGEVjBfIzksB
 q7lL2xRrMaM5ciNF27awBsvvlt18uSzHLH5UTDJeXMQyFHUl9nYaNj/3CFftFC0Ux2Kt
 tD9bh6lwCtDqz0ngQMoLwi3JgrNwwhjU8eusuIsg74TKwn6QcotIl8R4BmPc258PFIEA
 7Ytw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:mime-version;
 bh=9qOLcuN0gnoZhyVG2QTajwraQv7+oFDkni5kBbNUQoA=;
 b=Rn0WFXSjfKN0dZAaSAUnptBAZWa8D2W0IYR1fmOwDrslDpjY/F2AER46Hg45gpTYcU
 ecDAcCFUlnuApSfg6vMQ9E+Exj/XH8cGiw/eyQ6qpTEFDogzIsbthUtQ5CZaT3YLQXId
 JJfacgeY7x3BwHkK7jnH53kS8sNAGywjHrCkzsFnpoq47o9FfObGR37u5Bhb3oARNaVH
 ppjkFCyf9NfVwcyHVREERhkyXpjz+yOzKJdMJU/0zgOA6ezetww7OpJEFFyrG5rh69d1
 dEFRb2+jufUaIjzmOPdYHRs+fMWJC89UWhpa3zM53WchXlmfPnVHboeW+IjZ9fzwo2eC
 0RDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532yFZv55AryowbwSe9MuR/XOim06r3QzijDBxWyKJHyVyflbHm6
 CX4A9r3w0WfY4i2SNEXwhZTXbhoTmJFLKw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx08WI92ORid6VNLAqd0oXwRVVqdqDRp69FB8Gt91q4RskkNLM/cPsXgKfSHmhQMwtYk03k6Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:7e41:0:b029:249:287:3706 with SMTP id
 z62-20020a627e410000b029024902873706mr49562233pfc.76.1621073404325; 
 Sat, 15 May 2021 03:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([45.251.50.206])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm2381135pjm.20.2021.05.15.03.10.02
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Sat, 15 May 2021 03:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Utkarsh Singh <utkarsh190601@gmail.com>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#47885: [PATCH] org-table-import: Make it more smarter for
 interactive use
In-Reply-To: <874kf49x7f.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87czuq9958.fsf@gmail.com> <8735vmelfs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
 <87k0oyfj4y.fsf@gmail.com> <87im4h9irn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
 <87zgxpwqa7.fsf@gmail.com> <875z07jx6n.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
 <87tunqby9a.fsf@gmail.com> <s6c32o$grc$1@ciao.gmane.io>
 <875yzq77w8.fsf@gmail.com> <s7h22k$m9k$1@ciao.gmane.io>
 <87o8dd74dv.fsf@gmail.com> <874kf49x7f.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 15:40:11 +0530
Message-ID: <87pmxse29o.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a;
 envelope-from=utkarsh190601@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-x42a.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: (0.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25,
 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.997, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Maxim Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org,
 mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1621073658;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:
	 references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:
	 list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature;
	bh=9qOLcuN0gnoZhyVG2QTajwraQv7+oFDkni5kBbNUQoA=;
	b=FEERx9CnXdw4WBtajc5A5MmEQLox7r+8uuzB7A+MMMgpdcJXbnxVvkuniIE5yxu26bNaB8
	2ET/tod7Ajo9am4YPi4mAYH/hW4QEOEFy1c7VaX+DuLoocIhkOl1lcCjFja1vFf8A2vR59
	ozGQyhdp+E1rYQ42Vmv/yVssFPkyNYvSc2rVvDa4BumbEDRBt9Pn9zV8+/nQFIgPX2YH1v
	T8tnG42kHVi3I13DHw196kxmbsRbevG1fLyo+627Xm3aie5UiwTYybgzSOdUf/SknQtw+e
	DVlooxi3lHmn6TE5ahqCqF1gc+SiO00PX1YxtsuwCUE03WB70SIuXrJk+vGQ6w==
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1621073658; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=Zl09BCuccJuTOs5wRrPeNUglZxl/wmxocy3cInL6lWPYt40vOM7SztDGYWMdbUbjxaocWp
	R7Lu9+CecwC7DKQOmH9m6IEjJDl9vnK4ETtW/ytN1eTBXg6UT4/pOHCt1tL4jDUxNHfNVn
	6IxrIMaoo1fFDJ1e58NvR6ESncv/+38BPhzOymDF3IyrrHVZrcIkt3ba0otrf1L2hvMXeW
	I+bhjju0JS8d3ClMUpj868k4cgUMt6qLwjWwDEpFocHm7q8jClNagrv8bikhrIiHOyhDgt
	SXktApeZNBq6iS2cbZ4OgYqGDtvnfgABHsL0hRao9pX/o4mNpldqHW8AASstcQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="LdTIC/b5";
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.15
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="LdTIC/b5";
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D142821DB7
X-Spam-Score: -3.15
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com
X-TUID: gjvjHW9JUvTw

On 2021-05-15, 11:13 +0200, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Utkarsh and Maxim,
>
> Utkarsh Singh <utkarsh190601@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 2021-05-13, 00:08 +0700, Maxim Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Comma is decimal separator for es_ES, de_DE, ru_RU, etc. The point is
>>> that order in which separator candidates are tried should depend on
>>> active locale.
>>>
>>> I do not insist that interactive preview or smarter approach to guess
>>> separator have to be implemented. 
>
> I don't think the interactive preview would be that useful.  For the
> smarter approach, I think it will always be somewhat fragile, I don't
> think it is worth the addional complexity in Org's code.

Ok.

For now can you review the patches I proposed earlier in this thread?

Thank you,
Utkarsh Singh

-- 
Utkarsh Singh
http://utkarshsingh.xyz