From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Release 5.23a - [BUG ?] closing-notes Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:23:02 +0000 Message-ID: <87od9lw261.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <241642.11229.qm@web28315.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ98G-0006jd-RX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:23:24 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ98E-0006jR-Et for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:23:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ98E-0006jO-Ae for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:23:22 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ98D-0004XG-Lo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:23:22 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so997312nfh.26 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:23:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <241642.11229.qm@web28315.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (Giovanni Ridolfi's message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:58:18 +0100 (CET)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Giovanni Ridolfi Cc: "[emacs-orgmode] list" Hi Giovanni, Giovanni Ridolfi writes: > #+SEQ_TODO: TODO DONE > #+STARTUP: lognotedone > > * TODO write data proof > DEADLINE: <2008-03-10 lun +1d> Use lognoterepeat for logging such timestamps. > Comment: With v.5.21 I had: > - CLOSING NOTE [2008-03-10 lun 16:43] > > with v. 5.23(a?) a string is added to the file: > > ----------------------------------------- > - State "DONE" [2008-03-11 mar 17:30] Yes, see the option `org-log-note-headings' in case you want to configure this. > This seems to be not coherent with the manual > that states: > > |- > |"a line `CLOSED: [timestamp]' will be inserted just > |after the headline." > |- AFAIU the CLOSED: [timestamp] is added after the headline when closing non-repeating timestamps. Adding such a cookie would actually be a bit weird for _repeating_ timestamps... Hope this helps, -- Bastien