From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:18:56 -0700
Message-ID: <87oc7fjy4n.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikJdwe11ndjHw=wGVG7W9tC6G2Jm8sZHECAaK9y@mail.gmail.com>
	<87lj2ukfia.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4icegwl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<87wrmbwdsm.fsf@gmail.com> <87aaj5tbgl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<AANLkTimkGVZzqj3QS3g1=1qWLvbYk+h+MF5aWFWuWLh4@mail.gmail.com>
	<87bp3ka458.fsf@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinUA+4h3OrfFSAfvkXXCppKLSveiGOSo1aLQJhF@mail.gmail.com>
	<87hbd8kgqw.fsf@gmail.com> <80y66jvpwz.fsf@missioncriticalit.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49682 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Perth-0007gI-AG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:25:38 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Pertg-0008Uw-2F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:25:37 -0500
Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:43488)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Pertf-0008Up-Vx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:25:36 -0500
Received: by ywj3 with SMTP id 3so2023149ywj.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:25:35 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

S=C3=A9bastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>> I've just pushed up a new header argument combination ":comments noweb"
>> which will wrap all embedded noweb sections in link comments, as
>> demonstrated in the following example.  Hopefully this should be
>> sufficient for a complete mapping from a pure code file back to the
>> original org-mode file.
>
> If I understand correctly, this is some sort of enhancement to the ":comm=
ents
> yes" option.
>
> If yes, is there a reason to have both values, with subtle differences?
> Shouldn't we port the behavior of ":comments noweb" to the ":comments yes"
> value?
>

Yes, the reason to retain both variants is that in the case of short
noweb references embedded in a single line, e.g.

#+source: first
#+begin_src ruby
  5
#+end_src

#+begin_src ruby :noweb yes
  <<first>> + 6
#+end_src

the yes option would be preferable, as the insertion of comments around
the noweb reference would result in adding line breaks around the
reference and possibly breaking new-line sensitive code.

Cheers -- Eric

>
> Best regards,
>   Seb