From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: A Microsoftesque detail in org Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 11:48:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87oaliw70d.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87382yji8z.fsf@iki.fi> <87lhgqxeq0.fsf@gmx.us> <87k2w754vk.fsf@iki.fi> <874mnaykh0.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuHfQ-0003Qt-F1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 05:49:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuHfM-0007Cw-CJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 05:49:00 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuHfM-0007Cm-5q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 05:48:56 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YuHfI-0002iL-EW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 11:48:52 +0200 Received: from tsn85-159-237-4.dyn.nltelcom.net ([85.159.237.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 11:48:52 +0200 Received: from rasmus by tsn85-159-237-4.dyn.nltelcom.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 11:48:52 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rainer M Krug writes: > OK - this makes sense. But instead of jumping to the next line, a > splitting of the header into two would make more sense, keeping the > correct syntax. That is literally what my patch does IF you are in region four (more or less) of org-complex-heading-regexp. > Jumping to the next line is actually counter intuitive, as this is pure > movement. It's what it does in tables (most of the time). What would be better? —Rasmus -- However beautiful the theory, you should occasionally look at the evidence