From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-id-goto doesn't work if buffer is narrowed. Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:22:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87oafpz65e.fsf@gmx.us> References: <874mhh1u7s.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpitz-0004v1-94 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:25:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpitv-00020s-AV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:25:27 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpitv-00020G-4F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:25:23 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpitc-0005wH-Cm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:25:04 +0200 Received: from 46.166.186.251 ([46.166.186.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:25:04 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 46.166.186.251 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:25:04 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Puneeth, Thanks for the followup. Puneeth Chaganti writes: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Rasmus wrote: >> It's not obvious that org should change a—potentially—carefully selected >> narrowed region. > > I agree. But, am I not explicitly asking to jump to the specified > item. I don't mind the widening, at least when the call is > interactive. I agree with you when some other code is calling it, > though. I see your point, but I also remember being quite annoyed in the past when I lost my narrow because of e.g. inserting a footnote. >> Perhaps you could mimic the way org-edit-special works for this case. > > You mean, display the entry in a new buffer, and any changes will be > applied onto the original entry too? Yeah, I would prefer that. Would that work for you or would still prefer to have your buffer widened? Thanks, Rasmus -- I almost cut my hair, it happened just the other day