From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Changing behavior of org-insert-todo-heading-respect-content
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:52:31 +0200
Message-ID: <87o9p7z240.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAJr1M6d=0QTyNPWaBwbnciq2fM4mCYBRXOeR_hR-vA4Tj1kN5A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50679)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1e44sn-0006H2-50
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 08:52:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1e44sm-0006bP-Ep
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 08:52:37 -0400
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::194]:43094)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1e44sm-0006b8-8q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 08:52:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAJr1M6d=0QTyNPWaBwbnciq2fM4mCYBRXOeR_hR-vA4Tj1kN5A@mail.gmail.com>
	(Allen Li's message of "Sun, 15 Oct 2017 14:50:34 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Allen Li <vianchielfaura@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Allen Li <vianchielfaura@gmail.com> writes:

> Regarding the behavior of org-insert-todo-heading-respect-content,
> bound to C-S-return, consider the following .org file:
>
> * TODO some task
> ** WAITING other task
>
> If point is on the TODO line, pressing C-S-return yields
>
> * TODO some task
> ** WAITING other task
> * WAITING
>
> When I use C-S-return, I always desire
>
> * TODO some task
> ** WAITING other task
> * TODO
>
> Making C-S-return do this would break backward compatibility, but I
> think this behavior is more intuitive.  Thoughts?

I think the current behaviour is more than likely a bug. The one you
propose is indeed better. Would you want to provide a fix for that?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou