From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id +HkSIU7l6WSaAwAAG6o9tA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:43:10 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id +HkSIU7l6WSaAwAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:43:10 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25CC263CFB for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:43:10 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=PeVWJssY; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1693050190; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=nNlamPiI2FSbH5EnQRLDGiIDtFH7BcAD/W/uhYTAIvDvO3DGmlJToezEdptMxTqvCmg9P9 gkBiVjsPrLTP16xVWeLXyGQe/gs4lodSuUOL9LsYoYK3ti7G4/ioQmm3rZKB96+r2fxQYb Ui2eG6RKvMDgvpPJBx1l/BiWToNBpZaFqcIk2dBIPwyEhrUuyTR/9SCH9+RzoOXWsFscrv BpKwBdmzvKoK6vqA59BILFP1D34JEq0GD0NKZNdcagFdbKpGtQ/hxS9fasqq8fKtJiz4BB +LeHEGk6+oFMiHhQciXpJXd5SBIhuaLUQOD1OpIGUu71kGGS2XFTZ9AQUTiKYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=PeVWJssY; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1693050190; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=IL27dpV0vwRrThydKZuCGytKJDHKFa8VsrLYZ0tMgn8=; b=JqHWd5koKJ0EN7z0DgcyhFXC99r263rHfeVXW7uI3jRa7fiy8qBENYxouWch7F7w5Wzad4 dAMvIka9aNhZogBw3irKFefm7hQIjnRdiuwFMQIPEZy3Rp53WLfNeEfjMV1gY0/3xt0eWL Qpz7/blrpSkFHttr/utFhCkOcIZWqQaw0VpB3ZxRJ+8zd1AumtLcVuYl7EQ8vfJmV7ACgA CJhoniEvm7EHJEPdBHmJypEQVw4Bfzl6XqUB8fezMuAbOM2dQSeA7IOXO0r10gxsnda+4Q iFnT2U/1bCRtftZAWWm3BhbAyHCA0ipkqYbJvQg66Szv5Oicko3kh5XD1Y0SSg== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZrgV-0002aJ-3o; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 07:42:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZrgS-0002Ye-62 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 07:42:28 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZrgP-00014U-5T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 07:42:27 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0EB7240103 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:42:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693050142; bh=IL27dpV0vwRrThydKZuCGytKJDHKFa8VsrLYZ0tMgn8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=PeVWJssYeEvnOgENwqnjqKBNjUI+Q4WK+V9tjmXcbHPC0I353bbJfKkRhMYXHkFtY giqUvgn/cJWifxmz8rXGmU2qAwEbo01xXTLQ+ys2wAzEreQdODU2iXkzbgZqgx3vEI Y6O+DHCy/1U+DfwzonIfDO3wCEYu8U+AeRT74CU45bWLnfRJIgGnBfRL6BkbRd3Uy3 u1C6aOT4HhHkSgJWSqUrl8qxsckrGXRfUDq5lcxUhZGF2kQYApdNz4VxGCQALV4/qL DOqTe3c/fnoRzWu/5xqNwJ+f3cyhIS1gyEUZk4efEjwrOBzzBY+1I2H1W5qEwVwO6M zX7HOda37fLXw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RXw0Y5yq6z9rxH; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:42:21 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: Ihor Radchenko Cc: Bastien Guerry , "Fraga, Eric" , Samuel Wales , Max Nikulin , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks In-Reply-To: <87il92vzm9.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sat, 26 Aug 2023 10:58:54 +0000") References: <87o7omg4ie.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87bkfdud55.fsf@localhost> <87cyzswhqn.fsf@bzg.fr> <875y5hn4mt.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <878ra32jn9.fsf@bzg.fr> <87sf8a6r2l.fsf@localhost> <87v8d47jqh.fsf@bzg.fr> <87sf88d5r6.fsf@localhost> <87jztkve0g.fsf@bzg.fr> <874jko3ad6.fsf@localhost> <87a5ugk46o.fsf@bzg.fr> <87msygk3zh.fsf@localhost> <87bkewip2u.fsf@bzg.fr> <87il94k3a6.fsf@localhost> <875y54d24d.fsf@bzg.fr> <874jkok1eg.fsf@localhost> <87il94wn1t.fsf@bzg.fr> <87fs47h2x4.fsf@localhost> <87r0nrj96r.fsf@posteo.net> <87il92vzm9.fsf@localhost> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 11:42:19 +0000 Message-ID: <87o7iuowro.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx0.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -6.92 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 25CC263CFB X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.92 X-TUID: XQAR1u2nhXsb Ihor Radchenko writes: >> ... They >> behave like a true section, except that they are not headed by titles or >> level numbers. > > May they contain sub-sections? I think that would not be expected, since an anonymous section is just a break in the text that has neither a title nor a section number. There are many possible scenarios. Let's imagine, for example, that an author is working on a section of an article. And at the end of various subsections he/she wants to make some text breaks that, for whatever reason, don't deserve either a title or a subsubsection number. Anonymous breaks using asterisks or other symbols is usually the applied remedy. The advantage of enclosing the content of the anonymous section in an inlinetask is that we have a 'true' section with content (over which you have control). That would not happen if the author explicitly added a break symbol and continue writing. Anonymous breaks are also widely used in essay or narrative texts. An essay text, published as a blog entry or as an article, can be perfectly structured into anonymous sections: contents 1 *** contents 2 *** etc See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_(typography)#Section_form_and_numberi= ng https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_(typography)#Flourished_section_breaks --=20 Juan Manuel Mac=C3=ADas