From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Move to item to the bottom
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:10:01 +0200
Message-ID: <87mxgy9xjq.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTiksd8HAU5bu-=FqchGbSfsP7ULv5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<878vsjb14b.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkkya4ok.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87hb765qfz.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41532)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QcZjm-0002pZ-GV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:10:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QcZjj-0003Sh-By
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:10:10 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:61593)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QcZji-0003Q2-3P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:10:06 -0400
Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so2444874wwf.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87hb765qfz.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Fri, 01 Jul 2011
	10:57:04 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celoserpa@gmail.com>

Hello,

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes:

>> Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at
>> hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to
>> makes little sense. Thus, the item will be moved at the end of its
>> list.
>
> Nice.  Such a move could be bound to M-<up> when the cursor is on the
> first item, instead of throwing an error, as it does now.
>
> What do you think?

Good idea, as long as M-<down> also moves the last item to the top
position.

It needs a better optimization (my excuse for
`org-list-delete-item'). I will work on it tonight.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou