From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Problem with org-entities-user Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:30:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87mx0hb0q5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k3vtgnhy.fsf@gmail.com> <87sjaeduh5.fsf@gmail.com> <7CC1FB98-B071-429C-A230-B91D461104FD@gmail.com> <87d31idn1v.fsf@gmail.com> <2A730922-8F3C-4CEC-ACFA-AF04E6FF7DAB@gmail.com> <87zk4kdi0e.fsf@gmail.com> <8AE329E8-EE0F-45CB-B8FE-96A98EDEBE9E@gmail.com> <87sjaacucx.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TFhdv-0006MB-DV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:34:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TFhdt-0006KP-6r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:34:23 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:34804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TFhds-0006Jx-Vm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:34:21 -0400 Received: by weyu3 with SMTP id u3so1277753wey.0 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:34:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:57:19 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Org-mode , "Thomas S. Dye" Hello, Carsten Dominik writes: > On 22.9.2012, at 10:52, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> If the LaTeX command doesn't require an argument, you can always add it >> to `org-entities-user'. > > Yes, even though this is not very clean by itself. This is debatable. Entities are perfectly integrated into Org and are, by essence, multiple-back-end friendly. >> Anyway this is a minor point. I guess it will be swept under the rug of >> historical reasons, after all. > > Maybe not. I can go along with your arguments for cleanness. Would you > object to keeping this feature in as an option, turned off be default, > so that it is at least easy to keep lengthy files working? I'd rather leave it as it is, then. This option would require to maintain two versions of the parser: one without LaTeX commands and another one with them. That would defeat the whole point of removing them. > The way I understand it, the new exporter will be default in 8.0, so > this is the time to make some incompatible changes. Indeed. I will preserve my quota of backward-incompatible changes for other things. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou