From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: remote execution in heterogeneous environment
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:15:00 +0100
Message-ID: <87mwx8lk6j.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <6D36E0F9-01D1-4F95-9FAA-B2B2CA10E57E@gmail.com>
	<87623zaj4j.fsf@gmx.de> <87hang279z.fsf@gmx.de>
	<87d2y4oeys.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <8738z0wtgi.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<7451.1356023360@alphaville>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49115)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Tlji5-0007n2-31
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:15:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Tlji2-0008AX-Rn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:15:04 -0500
Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com ([74.125.82.170]:50757)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Tlji2-00088J-Jm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:15:02 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r1so1717823wey.15
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:15:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7451.1356023360@alphaville> (Nick Dokos's message of "Thu, 20
	Dec 2012 12:09:20 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:

> Isn't ``make test'' standard procedure before a commit? If not, it should be.
> Otherwise, why have a test suite?

"Errare humanum est... <snip>"

Yes, I should have tested.

But note that this is already committed in Emacs trunk.
My assumption by looking at the code was that if tests 
breaks, then we need to fix the tests, not the patch.

Again, if someone can help fixing the tests, that'd
help me a lot!  

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien