From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
Subject: Re: Adding support for limits and exclusions to iCal recurring
 events
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:25:06 +0200
Message-ID: <87mwpbg9al.fsf@toke.dk>
References: <87ehbaxt33.fsf@toke.dk> <87d2qa6cnh.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87y58yprs6.fsf@toke.dk> <87ip005p5b.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CALn3zoh9Y9QU3=o40Y-StN3W1SHB9dmDfXKM+wkf3ahHAHRRdA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60625)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <toke@toke.dk>) id 1V22oN-0001wx-SV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:25:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <toke@toke.dk>) id 1V22oL-0007l2-91
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:25:15 -0400
Received: from mail.tohojo.dk ([188.40.53.186]:60223)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <toke@toke.dk>)
	id 1V22oL-0007kb-2S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:25:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CALn3zoh9Y9QU3=o40Y-StN3W1SHB9dmDfXKM+wkf3ahHAHRRdA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Michael Brand's message of "Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:01:43 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com> writes:

> When implementing this, consider also whether the END_DATE should be
> an agenda entry on its own and of which kind, warning period etc. I
> tried to make an example that shows this issue.

Adding to this, as mentioned previously, I interpret the iCal standard
to really permit and end *time* rather than an end *date*. Which would
make more sense in an org context? Going for an END_TIME parameter, and
then comparing exactly to the scheduled time (i.e. if current iteration
of the recurring entry > END_TIME, then filter it), or doing an END_DATE
and then interpreting the actual cut-off to be at 00:00:00 on that date?

-Toke

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR8A3yAAoJEENeEGz1+utPh/oIAIUjNitaexnUxpR23q6QKUiT
uZOk0aampGeCK8otnmeHfan/hK+Rq+Ly87dPqIAXDWZnfnpLj8QZfUhvFyUDaQ09
mt6ySljk/6516sQEHKF0HBv51tGIN9QtHaCljOo7NIBYnsECv8YH+5dhmuAW/q+G
TB0ar/5IdPW7C3QAU7NJpViwMlj67hIBRhc9Wt2+qvmIlkV3Iz57lX+Pikj7i2xc
KZAUKGq7t7nKjNjLSu6khdWmITLMQwsgOyS8CS6wV55tXU9GWBU8z+HVoqUoieKV
fdDOxBY4l1nZnNli2Krh3Bhpm+fuIozk7MNXMeq4ixzU9O0xKwpw7+7+Wzjv3uw=
=AsXk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--