From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Simplify `org-show-context' configuration Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:00:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87mw4dwgof.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87lhjxh8q4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d25930tb.fsf@kyleam.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNVZI-0000Vf-Se for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:59:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNVZE-0007UQ-SN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:59:12 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:56397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNVZE-0007UB-ME for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:59:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87d25930tb.fsf@kyleam.com> (Kyle Meyer's message of "Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:15:44 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Kyle Meyer Cc: Org Mode List Kyle Meyer writes: Thanks for the feedback. > Minor: It took me some extra effort to parse this sentence because I'm > not used to seeing 'respectively' used in this way. I think something > like below is more common. > > As special cases, a nil or t value means show all contexts in > `minimal' or `full' view, respectively. Updated. Thank you. >> (defun org-reveal (&optional siblings) >> "Show current entry, hierarchy above it, and the following headline. >> -This can be used to show a consistent set of context around locations >> -exposed with `org-show-hierarchy-above' or `org-show-following-heading' >> -not t for the search context. >> + >> +This can be used to show a consistent set of context around >> +locations exposed with `org-show-context'. >> >> With optional argument SIBLINGS, on each level of the hierarchy all >> siblings are shown. This repairs the tree structure to what it would > > Does a single C-u serve a purpose anymore? Without it, it is `lineage' view. With it, it is `canonical' (but I forgot to update it). I'm not sure we need the distinction however. Also, I'm not sure how useful double C-u is. Regards,