From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEhlcmUgaXMgYSBwYXRjaCBJIHdhbnQgdG8gYWRkIHRvIG9y?=
 =?UTF-8?B?Zy5lbOKApuKApg==?=
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:49:59 +0100
Message-ID: <87mw3z8z08.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <54ED4E97.C3CC91.30527@m12-13.163.com>
	<87d24yb0u1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<54F0118E.D911F7.27458@m12-15.163.com>
	<olulhjjg0sa.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40216)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YRHXU-0006yv-IU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:49:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YRHXO-0005Xw-Pq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:48:56 -0500
Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:34155)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YRHXO-0005Xn-K4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:48:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <olulhjjg0sa.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> (Andreas Leha's message
	of "Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:29:41 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:

> I haven't looked at the patch and I do not understand how the patch
> achieves the removal of single overlays.  But I am in the same boat.  I
> also would (usually) like to remove only the rendered formula at the
> point.  I think that this should even be the default.

What Org version do you use? In development branch, C-c C-c doesn't
remove overlays related to images and formulas.

If you're talking about `org-toggle-latex-fragment', I don't think this
is an issue because images are cached, so showing them again is very
fast.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou