From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [bug] TODO [/] cookie not updating if list has inline task
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:40:02 +0100
Message-ID: <87mw06fgvx.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <877fs75tzk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87r3qfgvm4.fsf@gmx.us>
	<877fs782c3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lhgnxc1r.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87pp5y7trd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <871tibk631.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<87ioawvrzm.fsf@selenimh.access.network>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60184)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Z33g1-0000wO-Ia
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:41:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Z33fv-0006yl-V9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:41:53 -0400
Received: from mail-am1on0133.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([157.56.112.133]:13792
	helo=emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Z33fv-0006yY-Lr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:41:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87ioawvrzm.fsf@selenimh.access.network> (Nicolas Goaziou's
	message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2015 17:09:01 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Tuesday,  9 Jun 2015 at 17:09, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>
>> coming back to my original problem: is there a consensus on how
>> inline
>> tasks should be treated within lists?  Inline means to me that they
>> should not break up a list... but I would like this resolved if
>> possible.
>
> Fixed in a4cc9d82d8069741be64c55f35f9d3ad7e2663d5. Thank you.

and thanks again!
-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.4.1, Org release_8.3beta-802-g7e4228.dirty