From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Meyer Subject: Re: git question Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 09:24:19 -0400 Message-ID: <87mv8hu29o.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <87h8yq9fuv.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dT6ld-0005ep-9C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 09:24:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dT6la-0004W8-59 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 09:24:25 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54826 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dT6lZ-0004Vo-TJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 09:24:22 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EEA98616 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:24:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA6998615 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:24:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [24.60.167.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 298B998614 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:24:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87h8yq9fuv.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Hi, > > Re commit acabacaa5689f0644a47edae7c66bbdd68418194 > > http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=acabacaa5689f0644a47edae7c66bbdd68418194 > > This should probably have gone to maint as it is a bugfix. For some > reason I pushed the commit to master. > > Could I now use git cherry-pick to add it maint? Or is there a better > way? Or is it better to just let it live on master and only be part of > the next major Org version? Yep, git cherry-pick should be used in these situations. -- Kyle