From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id KIr2JBuk3GT0DwAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:25:31 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id cJqeJBuk3GTswgAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:25:31 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B1459E42 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:25:31 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="I2Bth/jI"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1692181531; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=r/bxLVPJDOY+FiiRW2L+1xMRRufj0GHO/oaWwe4U3k0=; b=JfTGTBFBP2ClcaVLCwIikjFBonn/aLYD+iRkf6A7L86g0Aa9I2C7KFogWV0acAOooLaSiv 5UTr8z6PBkx1S2rbiyKpjoghM1NmnKjWWCZsecxUq8jv3T6NygULTzE5TjZ78zaSdlVpxE mXDIMJt0uhmDsh8JELhM410qTvAZCZv3wd8P6giXhNneqH84jDw4+rHc2JKg7hRcGsVbQo sHK9rxsYQTYDd2edsIUcwIIUDha63hFshGcI7ESxnLpqcS8TOdXWowByYo2MGCXKwLN+PQ LJzKsr7dOGj4JHtDZoMRMyFURAZQmrTn7Cdzn9Z28xhKXFj/iRehka7wTf08Tw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="I2Bth/jI"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1692181531; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Wfh5ug8t24GsQzkQiUegwC5RdKS7+jy12lWV+ryyh89D0R5YXeLBghxzbs8h+/LEtIP+3G ETrr9CIkNd9YuXy5tiejovIuS6JLUwRYjM4sSM+uYPB5/YI0DspSaOroHrG7avkvNjQbqU zlXzq/zsKajlM5zJ/FhSQT+k+Hkwg9r3TQ4F8vFlayd8uEXnWrVvBDlCb8ng8ML4ZZ3srP xc0ppsxjDLvXmco/r8mNnvUja2IfIw4JLu/rDlKB5wBGc4q13VqngeUZOCTIWQkpRA5894 Vbj3ecX0SxO1vkWrU+EL0PQIpeXrTSsUznlNZQ6MEyASjs0XsuPv6UT6YszXcg== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qWDhg-0000Tk-4t; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 06:24:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qWDhb-0000TG-R8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 06:24:35 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qWDhY-00039b-Mp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 06:24:35 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B752240029 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:24:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1692181470; bh=ZBqrh1LSSWHcES+wIEo2uGSWxRHKmNobZ8zq62+aQFA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=I2Bth/jIGG76C8kf8lmSPfQtIS0aeJkyGN01Xmjh6Rdt/gslrDiT78OxsJGTan/gg W0roCY/Ids8rFTs4m9+5ojb2sJ4Vw+UHYMRjbeTwM2IX/5tcodmOAFg3XwMk/BsR+g cRsQ2rpGMuZJ4ci4irlRNhorYr8CmPtVRD25kCyaWVzXgkrQ9a12tgguDKoh9NRsVi ksoXj1ggfdvdeaKcXboRM3ZHfdrV8dQONQZ7VZGTRBMXL/1e6oJWhD0egN7fD2KZnb wgFjVi99UNbfV772YXnzNBkZbQupCdAeZc48PLw3t6wx4mAMwgz9v90GVgrXNFMhJj pveDu8DavmiSw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RQklK4V0gz9rxR; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:24:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Tom Gillespie Cc: Russell Adams , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: [POLL] Should we accept breaking changes to get rid of Org libraries that perform side effects when loading? In-Reply-To: References: <87jzz8f3re.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87mt43agk6.fsf@localhost> <874jq8ohbr.fsf@localhost> <87bkfip3mo.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0odrkbp.fsf@localhost> <875y5pvf04.fsf@bzg.fr> <87bkfdud55.fsf@localhost> <87cyzswhqn.fsf@bzg.fr> <728cf24e-dc01-48d9-afe5-fc7469fe25f1@app.fastmail.com> <87wmxwpc0k.fsf@localhost> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:24:58 +0000 Message-ID: <87msyrnv2d.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Spam-Score: -5.39 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 10B1459E42 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.39 X-TUID: IWuzts4Td8di Tom Gillespie writes: >> Any other ideas? I'd be happy to see some brain-storming. > > Maybe a #+keyword[options]: that doubles as a dynamic block or > something like that? > #+inline_task[options]: TODO some tiny task > #+inline_task[options]: TODO some small task > DEADLINE: <2023-11-11> > :PROPERTIES: > :SOMETHING: or other > :END: > #+inline_task_end: I am not sure if I like [options]. If we support property drawer, why would we need additional options? I'd rather stick closer to the heading syntax (but without that 15x****... madness). I also _slightly_ do not like #+... syntax because I expect some interference with fontification code for "meta lines". > Migration path should be straight forward, the exact implementation of > the behavior might need > a bit of work, and I'm not sure that the scheduling line will work in > that context, it is too fart > outside the usual behavior for keywords. However it might be possible > to move the deadline into [options] > the syntax would be a bit different than regular scheduling lines, but > it would at least be consistent > with keyword syntax. It would actually be a headache to move planning into options. A number of places in Org hard-code planning line regexp and will have to be modified significantly to accommodate [options]. In particular, I have org-agenda in mind (the place I rarely dare to touch) > The other question is whether you actually need an #+inline_task_end: > or whether there is another way. Another idea might be similar to footnote definitions that mark their end with double blank line. But I do not like footnote definition syntax because it makes it impossible to have something like [fn:1] Footnote definition containing src block #+begin_src elisp "This has two newlines and not an src block anymore because footnote definition ending takes precedence" #+end_src -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at