* Multiple :LOGBOOK: blocks "allowed" without unwanted side effects?
@ 2012-03-20 9:07 Rainer Stengele
2012-03-20 9:52 ` Achim Gratz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Stengele @ 2012-03-20 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Hi all,
I want to be sure that multiple :LOBGOOK: blocks in sequence are making no trouble.
As an example I have this:
***** NEXT A task
:LOGBOOK:
CLOCK: [2012-03-19 Mo 16:45]--[2012-03-19 Mo 17:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-03-12 Mo 14:15]--[2012-03-12 Mo 14:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-03-07 Mi 11:15]--[2012-03-07 Mi 11:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-24 Fr 16:30]--[2012-02-24 Fr 16:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-14 Di 13:15]--[2012-02-14 Di 13:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-03 Fr 09:15]--[2012-02-03 Fr 09:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-01 Mi 12:00]--[2012-02-01 Mi 12:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-30 Mo 16:45]--[2012-01-30 Mo 17:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-30 Mo 09:30]--[2012-01-30 Mo 09:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-25 Mi 14:45]--[2012-01-25 Mi 15:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-13 Fr 17:00]--[2012-01-13 Fr 17:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-12-19 Mo 16:45]--[2011-12-19 Mo 17:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-12-02 Fr 11:45]--[2011-12-02 Fr 12:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-11-17 Do 10:15]--[2011-11-17 Do 10:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-11-10 Do 08:45]--[2011-11-10 Do 09:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-11-08 Di 09:45]--[2011-11-08 Di 10:15] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-10-25 Di 09:45]--[2011-10-25 Di 10:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-10-10 Mo 13:30]--[2011-10-10 Mo 14:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-10-04 Di 15:15]--[2011-10-04 Di 15:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-10-04 Di 08:30]--[2011-10-04 Di 09:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-09-23 Fr 10:30]--[2011-09-23 Fr 10:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-09-13 Di 10:45]--[2011-09-13 Di 11:15] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-08-30 Di 14:15]--[2011-08-30 Di 14:45] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-08-08 Mo 13:30]--[2011-08-08 Mo 14:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-07-08 Fr 23:00]--[2011-07-09 Sa 01:00] => 2:00
CLOCK: [2011-07-08 Fr 18:15]--[2011-07-08 Fr 18:45] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-07-08 Fr 17:15]--[2011-07-08 Fr 17:45] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-06-27 Mo 09:30]--[2011-06-27 Mo 09:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-05-25 Mi 09:00]--[2011-05-25 Mi 09:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-05-13 Fr 16:15]--[2011-05-13 Fr 16:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-04-11 Mo 08:30]--[2011-04-11 Mo 08:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-03-22 Di 14:00]--[2011-03-22 Di 14:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-02-23 Mi 13:00]--[2011-02-23 Mi 13:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-02-09 Mi 07:30]--[2011-02-09 Mi 08:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-01-26 Mi 09:30]--[2011-01-26 Mi 10:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-01-11 Di 13:30]--[2011-01-11 Di 13:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-12-02 Do 10:00]--[2010-12-02 Do 10:45] => 0:45
CLOCK: [2010-11-25 Do 08:30]--[2010-11-25 Do 09:30] => 1:00
CLOCK: [2010-10-14 Do 08:30]--[2010-10-14 Do 08:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-09-27 Mo 08:00]--[2010-09-27 Mo 08:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-09-21 Di 16:30]--[2010-09-21 Di 16:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-09-13 Mo 08:30]--[2010-09-13 Mo 08:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-08-10 Di 09:30]--[2010-08-10 Di 09:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-08-04 Mi 08:00]--[2010-08-04 Mi 08:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-08-03 Di 09:45]--[2010-08-03 Di 10:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-06-29 Di 11:30]--[2010-06-29 Di 12:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2010-06-11 Fr 16:30]--[2010-06-11 Fr 16:55] => 0:25
CLOCK: [2010-06-01 Di 09:05]--[2010-06-01 Di 09:12] => 0:07
CLOCK: [2010-05-31 Mo 10:40]--[2010-05-31 Mo 10:50] => 0:10
CLOCK: [2010-04-16 Fr 12:45]--[2010-04-16 Fr 13:06] => 0:21
CLOCK: [2010-03-12 Fr 09:13]--[2010-03-12 Fr 09:19] => 0:06
CLOCK: [2010-03-12 Fr 08:55]--[2010-03-12 Fr 09:11] => 0:16
:END:
Most times I manually have to adjust the latest CLOCK entry.
In order to do this I have to open the :LOGBOOK: drawer, which fills my screen with all the old entries,
Therefore I cannot see the contents belonging to the headline.
Is it ok to put let's say all entries older than 2012 in a separate :LOBGOOK block and all the 2012 entries
in another block:
:LOGBOOK:
CLOCK: [2012-03-19 Mo 16:45]--[2012-03-19 Mo 17:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-03-12 Mo 14:15]--[2012-03-12 Mo 14:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-03-07 Mi 11:15]--[2012-03-07 Mi 11:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-24 Fr 16:30]--[2012-02-24 Fr 16:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-14 Di 13:15]--[2012-02-14 Di 13:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-03 Fr 09:15]--[2012-02-03 Fr 09:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-01 Mi 12:00]--[2012-02-01 Mi 12:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-30 Mo 16:45]--[2012-01-30 Mo 17:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-30 Mo 09:30]--[2012-01-30 Mo 09:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-25 Mi 14:45]--[2012-01-25 Mi 15:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-13 Fr 17:00]--[2012-01-13 Fr 17:15] => 0:15
:END:
:LOGBOOK:
CLOCK: [2011-12-19 Mo 16:45]--[2011-12-19 Mo 17:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-12-02 Fr 11:45]--[2011-12-02 Fr 12:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-11-17 Do 10:15]--[2011-11-17 Do 10:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-11-10 Do 08:45]--[2011-11-10 Do 09:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-11-08 Di 09:45]--[2011-11-08 Di 10:15] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-10-25 Di 09:45]--[2011-10-25 Di 10:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-10-10 Mo 13:30]--[2011-10-10 Mo 14:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-10-04 Di 15:15]--[2011-10-04 Di 15:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-10-04 Di 08:30]--[2011-10-04 Di 09:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-09-23 Fr 10:30]--[2011-09-23 Fr 10:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-09-13 Di 10:45]--[2011-09-13 Di 11:15] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-08-30 Di 14:15]--[2011-08-30 Di 14:45] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-08-08 Mo 13:30]--[2011-08-08 Mo 14:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-07-08 Fr 23:00]--[2011-07-09 Sa 01:00] => 2:00
CLOCK: [2011-07-08 Fr 18:15]--[2011-07-08 Fr 18:45] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-07-08 Fr 17:15]--[2011-07-08 Fr 17:45] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-06-27 Mo 09:30]--[2011-06-27 Mo 09:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-05-25 Mi 09:00]--[2011-05-25 Mi 09:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-05-13 Fr 16:15]--[2011-05-13 Fr 16:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-04-11 Mo 08:30]--[2011-04-11 Mo 08:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-03-22 Di 14:00]--[2011-03-22 Di 14:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-02-23 Mi 13:00]--[2011-02-23 Mi 13:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2011-02-09 Mi 07:30]--[2011-02-09 Mi 08:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-01-26 Mi 09:30]--[2011-01-26 Mi 10:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2011-01-11 Di 13:30]--[2011-01-11 Di 13:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-12-02 Do 10:00]--[2010-12-02 Do 10:45] => 0:45
CLOCK: [2010-11-25 Do 08:30]--[2010-11-25 Do 09:30] => 1:00
CLOCK: [2010-10-14 Do 08:30]--[2010-10-14 Do 08:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-09-27 Mo 08:00]--[2010-09-27 Mo 08:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-09-21 Di 16:30]--[2010-09-21 Di 16:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-09-13 Mo 08:30]--[2010-09-13 Mo 08:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-08-10 Di 09:30]--[2010-08-10 Di 09:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-08-04 Mi 08:00]--[2010-08-04 Mi 08:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-08-03 Di 09:45]--[2010-08-03 Di 10:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2010-06-29 Di 11:30]--[2010-06-29 Di 12:00] => 0:30
CLOCK: [2010-06-11 Fr 16:30]--[2010-06-11 Fr 16:55] => 0:25
CLOCK: [2010-06-01 Di 09:05]--[2010-06-01 Di 09:12] => 0:07
CLOCK: [2010-05-31 Mo 10:40]--[2010-05-31 Mo 10:50] => 0:10
CLOCK: [2010-04-16 Fr 12:45]--[2010-04-16 Fr 13:06] => 0:21
CLOCK: [2010-03-12 Fr 09:13]--[2010-03-12 Fr 09:19] => 0:06
CLOCK: [2010-03-12 Fr 08:55]--[2010-03-12 Fr 09:11] => 0:16
:END:
which will give me this overview when adjusting an entry:
***** NEXT A task
:LOGBOOK:
CLOCK: [2012-03-19 Mo 16:45]--[2012-03-19 Mo 17:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-03-12 Mo 14:15]--[2012-03-12 Mo 14:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-03-07 Mi 11:15]--[2012-03-07 Mi 11:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-24 Fr 16:30]--[2012-02-24 Fr 16:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-14 Di 13:15]--[2012-02-14 Di 13:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-03 Fr 09:15]--[2012-02-03 Fr 09:30] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-02-01 Mi 12:00]--[2012-02-01 Mi 12:15] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-30 Mo 16:45]--[2012-01-30 Mo 17:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-30 Mo 09:30]--[2012-01-30 Mo 09:45] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-25 Mi 14:45]--[2012-01-25 Mi 15:00] => 0:15
CLOCK: [2012-01-13 Fr 17:00]--[2012-01-13 Fr 17:15] => 0:15
:END:
:LOGBOOK: ...>
Are there any unwanted side effects?
I could not find an answer in the org manual.
Thanks,
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Multiple :LOGBOOK: blocks "allowed" without unwanted side effects?
2012-03-20 9:07 Multiple :LOGBOOK: blocks "allowed" without unwanted side effects? Rainer Stengele
@ 2012-03-20 9:52 ` Achim Gratz
2012-03-20 16:11 ` Rainer Stengele
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Achim Gratz @ 2012-03-20 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele <at> online.de> writes:
> I want to be sure that multiple :LOBGOOK: blocks in sequence are making no
trouble.
I don't know about having multiple LOGBOOK drawers, that feels dirty... What I
do is having a CLOSED drawer defined, putting it directly behind the LOGBOOK
drawer and then just shift the boundary between the two (the two lines
:END:\n:CLOSED:\n) whenever I feel like it (at the end of the week, mainly).
:LOGBOOK:
...whatever
:END:
:CLOSED:
...whatever else
:END:
Achim.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Multiple :LOGBOOK: blocks "allowed" without unwanted side effects?
2012-03-20 9:52 ` Achim Gratz
@ 2012-03-20 16:11 ` Rainer Stengele
2012-03-20 18:57 ` Achim Gratz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Stengele @ 2012-03-20 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-orgmode
Am 20.03.2012 10:52, schrieb Achim Gratz:
> Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele <at> online.de> writes:
>> I want to be sure that multiple :LOBGOOK: blocks in sequence are making no
> trouble.
>
> I don't know about having multiple LOGBOOK drawers, that feels dirty... What I
> do is having a CLOSED drawer defined, putting it directly behind the LOGBOOK
> drawer and then just shift the boundary between the two (the two lines
> :END:\n:CLOSED:\n) whenever I feel like it (at the end of the week, mainly).
>
> :LOGBOOK:
> ....whatever
> :END:
> :CLOSED:
> ....whatever else
> :END:
>
> Achim.
>
>
>
I wonder if any of the clocking table functions is looking at the drawer names or begin end markers or
is simply collecting all CLOCK entries, which would say that the "management/hiding" of the
CLOCK entries by drawer names is no problem.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Multiple :LOGBOOK: blocks "allowed" without unwanted side effects?
2012-03-20 16:11 ` Rainer Stengele
@ 2012-03-20 18:57 ` Achim Gratz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Achim Gratz @ 2012-03-20 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@online.de> writes:
> I wonder if any of the clocking table functions is looking at the
> drawer names or begin end markers or is simply collecting all CLOCK
> entries, which would say that the "management/hiding" of the CLOCK
> entries by drawer names is no problem.
Nicolas would be a more authoritative source, but AFAIK the drawers are
completely transparent to anything that works with existing markers.
They are only looked up when you create a new entry and specified which
drawer they should end up in.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-20 18:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-20 9:07 Multiple :LOGBOOK: blocks "allowed" without unwanted side effects? Rainer Stengele
2012-03-20 9:52 ` Achim Gratz
2012-03-20 16:11 ` Rainer Stengele
2012-03-20 18:57 ` Achim Gratz
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).