From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Carriage return in macro
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:06:37 +0200
Message-ID: <87li3nosw2.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87txig8982.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvtwkb8q.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ob8jowvb.wl%wiskey5alpha@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39221)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VEOb2-0006Ql-Oa
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:06:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VEOau-0003Qy-Bq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:06:32 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22e]:58306)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VEOau-0003Qt-5Y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:06:24 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id q54so4398815wes.33
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87ob8jowvb.wl%wiskey5alpha@gmail.com> (Tim's message of "Tue, 27
	Aug 2013 13:40:40 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Tim <wiskey5alpha@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Tim <wiskey5alpha@gmail.com> writes:

> If I put several lines into an #+BEGIN_ODT..#+END_ODT block, all whitespace 
> formating is lost.  A list like
>
> - List one
> - List two
> - List three 
>
> becomes
>
> - List one - List two - List three

I don't quite understand. You are expected to put valid odt code within
an ODT block. You may be after an example block?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou