From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexis Subject: Re: org-contacts development Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 20:04:26 +1000 Message-ID: <87lhtrmr11.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8761kxnno5.fsf@gmail.com> <877g5c8vyb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wo8of-0005wx-UK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 06:04:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wo8oZ-0000z9-Rz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 06:04:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22f]:43016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wo8oZ-0000yz-KA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 06:04:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rp16so5303732pbb.34 for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 03:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ppp118-209-145-187.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net. [118.209.145.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yw3sm8593447pbc.69.2014.05.24.03.04.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 24 May 2014 03:04:30 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <877g5c8vyb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Improving org-contacts.el and making it part of Org core are two > separate issues -- not everything that is part of Org core gets a > lot of attention, and some contributed packages do. Oh okay, fair enough! > I'd say: go ahead with whatever conventions you want to enforce > and the community will step up -- or just applaud :) Heh, okay. :-) > PS: Actually, being part of Org core sometimes slow down things, > because substantial contributions then need to come from people > who assign their copyright to the Free Software Foundation. *nod* Good point .... i'd be happy to assign copyright to the FSF, myself, but i know that doing so is an issue for many people. Alexis.