From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FR] fill caption
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 23:55:04 -0400
Message-ID: <87k36mw9uv.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <539C84B3.9060302@toel.it> <87zjhf6rz2.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87y4vd8kgy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42937)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1XEsJz-0005ty-Cs
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 23:55:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1XEsJq-00016f-BJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 23:55:27 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87y4vd8kgy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Daniele Pizzolli <dan@toel.it>, emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Bastien,

2014ko uztailak 27an, Bastien-ek idatzi zuen:
>=20
> Hi Aaron,
>=20
> Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> writes:
>=20
>> There=E2=80=99s a warning in the Org manual about using filladapt with o=
rg, but
>> I=E2=80=99ve never noticed any problems.
>=20
> Interesting -- was it always like this?  Or is it due to the recent
> improvements Nicolas made to the filling mechanisms?  If the manual
> needs to remove the warning, let's do so.

This warning was introduced on Sep 21 2012 in commit 6cb676f6.  AFAIK,
that predates Nicolas=E2=80=99s work.  I will let you make the decision abo=
ut
whether the warning should be removed.

--=20
Aaron Ecay