From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Josiah Schwab <jschwab@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Using #+INCLUDE for a .tex file
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:55:32 -0800
Message-ID: <87k2ljmasb.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CAPx+V7YQxEDK9VxZ78tCwg=NeOQrf34gWdVpoGkx-LAq2LBQQg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42141)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jschwab@gmail.com>) id 1abc9h-000433-Pj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 17:55:38 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jschwab@gmail.com>) id 1abc9g-000448-PN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 17:55:37 -0500
Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]:36439)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jschwab@gmail.com>) id 1abc9g-00043w-I0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 17:55:36 -0500
Received: by mail-pa0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id fi3so20766289pac.3
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:55:36 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <CAPx+V7YQxEDK9VxZ78tCwg=NeOQrf34gWdVpoGkx-LAq2LBQQg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nooreen Dabbish <nerd@temple.edu>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello Nooreen,

> I am now resorting to
>
> #BEGIN_LATEX
> \include{file}
> #+END_LATEX
>
> But  I am unhappy with this solution because I would like to generate the
> include line as the raw results of a code block.

I don't know anything about code block results, but would

@@latex:\include{file}@@

or

#+LATEX: \include{file}

be better?

http://orgmode.org/manual/Quoting-LaTeX-code.html#Quoting-LaTeX-code

Hope that (might) help,
Josiah