From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrea <agiugliano91@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: org -> org export ignores latex blocks [8.3.4
 (8.3.4-50-g83e373-elpaplus @
 /home/andrea/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160509/)]
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 23:44:05 +0100
Message-ID: <87k2iyq4lm.fsf@freedom.localdomain>
References: <87twi343jk.fsf@freedom.localdomain>
	<CA+M2ft8zzhfa6Jb5EoPcGxS73Sn6CtUPcGpqyAv50CJkV4Hd3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFyQvY1Wwu_9k6pS8mzw_Eb7Qo-SX-mtQdfHLZCi+o=Apg2-2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+M2ft-SJYLXAGeSqx2LYrR1qK7YmdS9HnYtM52b-ei9sckhyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<878tzfneds.fsf@freedom.localdomain>
	<CAFyQvY2EBBdrAFBL_snPpGHiUNgMZ8_bUAoAi1G6yAq7YiLE5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<877feyoqzr.fsf@freedom.localdomain>
	<CAFyQvY0=cBVS2KoYJe1q2wxngxTosL0kCXxoVqdLR9=DmzevdA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54772)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <agiugliano91@gmail.com>) id 1b0zIi-0007BO-Ea
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 18:41:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <agiugliano91@gmail.com>) id 1b0zIe-0000B0-3Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 18:41:47 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]:35620)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <agiugliano91@gmail.com>) id 1b0zId-0000At-S3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 18:41:44 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id e201so1389977wme.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <CAFyQvY0=cBVS2KoYJe1q2wxngxTosL0kCXxoVqdLR9=DmzevdA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Okay, I have deleted the org one and left the org-contrib:
I can still use the new feature (probably org-contrib enables it).
Thanks for your explanation,

Andrea

Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:20 PM Andrea <agiugliano91@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think I saw that, but I did not read it carefully. And since the
>> autocompletion (I mean <l+TAB) still gives me the #+BEGINE_LaTex it did
>> not occur to me that may be the problem.
>>
>> By the way, I did not clone the git repo, so I should be on the master
>> published on ELPA.
>
>
> The versions published on ELPA are from the maint branch of org git.
>
>
>> When I give org-version in emacs I get:
>> Org-mode version 8.3.4 (8.3.4-50-g83e373-elpaplus @
>> /home/andrea/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160509/)
>>
>> On package-list-packages I have
>>
>>   org                20160509      installed             Outline-based
>> notes management and organizer
>>   org-plus-contrib   20160509      installed             Outline-based
>> notes management and organizer
>>
>
> Correct, both are the exact same stable 8.3.x versions; just that
> org-plus-contrib has the packages in contrib/ folder which the other does
> not have.
>
> Also installing just org-plus-contrib should suffice. You do not need to
> install both. If you are not using any package from the contrib/ area (
> http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/tree/contrib/lisp?h=maint ), you
> do not need org-plus-contrib, and you can use just the org package.
>
> But the mystery is still unresolved for me.. why did #+BEGIN_EXPORT syntax
> work for you .. May be someone else more knowledgeable can answer that.
> --